Lily Iona MacKenzie's Blog for Writers & Readers

MY BLOG POSTS COMMENT ON SOME ASPECTS OF WRITING & READING.

novels

MEET PROLIFIC AUTHOR MICHAEL C. WHITE WHO TAKES US INSIDE HIS WRITING LIFE IN THIS INTERVIEW!

Michael C. White is the author of seven novels: Soul Catcher (William Morrow), which was a Booksense and Historical Novels Review selection, as well as a finalist for the Connecticut Book Award; A Brother’s Blood (Harper Collins), which was a New York Times Book Review Notable Book, a Barnes and Noble Discover Great New Writers nominee, and an Edgar Award Finalist; The Blind Side of the Heart (Harper Collins), A Dream of Wolves (Harper Collins), and The Garden of Martyrs (St. Martins), also a Connecticut Book Award finalist and made into an opera. His novel Beautiful Assassin (William Morrow) won the 2011 Connecticut Book Award for Fiction.  His last novel, Resting Places, won the $5000 National Tuscany Prize for the Novel and

was recently selected as a runner-up for the Indie Author Project General Fiction Award.  A collection of his short stories, Marked Men, was published by the University of Missouri Press. He has also published over 50 short stories in literary and national magazines. He was the founding editor of the yearly fiction anthologies American Fiction and Dogwood, and was the founder and former director of Fairfield University’s MFA in Creative Writing Program. He lives along the New England coast with his wife Reni and his two Labradors, Falstaff and Lincoln.

Who are your literary influences or inspiration?

Through my undergrad and Ph.D. programs I was influenced, sometime unduly so, by the great American writers in the canon: Melville, Crane, Hemingway, and Faulkner.  I especially found myself in the thrall of the two opposing masters, Hemingway (made a pilgrimage to his grave in Ketcham, Idaho) and Faulkner.  I wrote short cryptic stories in the manner of Hemingway and an entire (bad) novel trying to do a modern, As I Lay Dying, in multiple voices.  For almost two decades I stopped reading or trying to write novels, and tried to learn the craft of short fiction.  I read widely—Melville’s and Crane’s stories, Carver, Bobbie Ann Mason, the great stories of Flannery O’Connor and John Cheever—and published over 50 stories in lit journals.  I even started a couple of lit magazines, one of which is still publishing now.  During this time I read hundreds and later thousands of short stories manuscripts submitted to me.  I found that this was very much a second graduate degree in writing.  I learned both from the good stories, but even more from the not-so-good ones.  Since writing and publishing novels I have learned a great deal from both debut novelists and from those who have published dozens of books. Though I’ve published eight novels, I still try to learn something from every novel I read. They are my best teacher.

Why do you write?

I wish I could say that I was one of those bookish kids that couldn’t wait to open a novel on a rainy day and spend the time reading. But, alas, I was not.  We had no books in my house—I mean none, and not a single bookcase.  Until my senior year in high school, I was a three-sport jock in school.  I yearned not to write the Great American Novel, but to play shortstop for the New York Yankees (I would even have considered the Red Sox).  My father was a farmer, and then a carpenter.  As a little boy I used to go with him to work at his jobsites, and later to earn some money (to see a dramatization of this relationship, check out my novel Skunktown).  My father was a heavy drinker, and during the day as we worked, he would take nips from the pint bottle in his back pocket and tell me stories, tall, Bunyonesque tales of the Vermont woods where he was raised on a farm.  After work, we’d go to some tavern or gin mill, where the drinking and story-telling continued. “What are you drinking?  Tell us a story, Wes,” men would cry out as soon as he entered.  I would sit in some corner booth, sipping a coke, listening and watching as grown, hardscrabble men—electrician and masons and farmers—fell under his sway of his voice.  He continued to tell stories, which got bigger and bolder, as long as they continued to buy drinks for him.  Though I wasn’t bookish at all, I found myself thrilled by my father performance.  I thought to myself: I’d like to do that.  Tell stories that people want to hear.

Tell an anecdote about an interaction between you and one of your more articulate fans.

My second novel, The Blind Side of the Heart, was a story I based loosely on a priest in Western Massachusetts accused of sexual abuse and later of murder. Because of the close connection of my book to the real priest, I got a lot of local publicity as well as letters and emails.  But there was one that shocked me.  I opened the letter and saw that the letterhead said it was from the maximum security men’s prison in Nashua, New Hampshire.  The letter was five, typed, single-spaced page.  I read the first two paragraphs with the delight that comes from an obvious fan of your work.  Even more than that, I was struck by how articulate and educated the writer appeared.  Here was someone who was himself a writer,  I thought.  But as I read on, I realized he wasn’t a professional writer; rather he was a priest, and he liked my book for having captured the interior life of a priest. More than that though, he was struck by how similar my priest’s situation in the book was to that of his own!  By the end of the letter I came to understand that the writer/priest was serving a 35-70 year term for sexually abusing several boys in his congregation.   Like my own character in the novel, he swore that he was innocent.  He told me that a journalist from the Wall Street Journal was investigating his case in the hopes of finding him innocent. He said that since we had so much in common (I debated that) he  wondered if the two of us could meet.  It took eight months to get on his visitor list, but out of curiosity to see my character “in the flesh,” as it were, I finally did and was able meet him.  That was one of the most surprising letters I’d ever receive from one of my readers.

Where do your characters come from?

I usually begin with story and slowly build my characters around the story. However, I often will find characters along the way that are based loosely on people I know.  For instance, in my novel A Dream of Wolves, I based one of the main characters on a woman who was a good friend.  I based the character’s looks on this woman, but most importantly, I used the real woman’s very peculiar laugh for that of my character.  Though having said that I start with story and then find my characters, in my new novel Skunktown, I started with character first.  The main character and narrator, Lyman, was based on my own life, and the father in the novel is based on my father.

How do you start a novel?

As I said previously, I usually start with story, particularly with a kernel of a story. It may be something I read in a newspaper or heard on TV, or it may come from a story someone has told me.  My novel Beautiful Assassin, a novel about Russian female sniper in WWII, started from a snippet of a documentary I heard on TV.  It was about a real sniper named Ludmila Pavlichenko, who had 306 German kills in the war and was invited by Eleanor Roosevelt to the White House.  All of this I used in the novel.  In the first chapter, I put my character in a tree hoping to get a better shot at a fellow German sniper.  This was based on an interview the real sniper gave to an American magazine about one terrifying moment during the war.

Where do your ideas come from for narratives/poems? Do you travel to research your book(s)?

I do a lot of research. Besides, textual research—books and articles—about the subject I’m writing about, I try to visit the places that my characters inhabit.  An example of this is making over twenty trips to northern Maine for my first novel A Brother’s Blood.  Visting a place helps me to see and feel what my character sees and feels.  Besides helping to establish my credibility to write a particular story, I often get ideas about character and plot.  An instance of this was in my novel Soul Catcher, about a slave catcher after a runaway slave.  Since I envisioned my runaway traveling to northern New York to escaped slave encampment—one that John Brown actually lived at and helped to run—I went to North Elba, New York, to see the encampment for myself.  While there, walking the grounds of John Brown’s old farm, I pictured two distinct scenes that would later become chapters.  Also, I decided then and there that John Brown would become a crucial part of my narrative.

We’ve all heard the advice that authors should “write what they know.” But fiction emerges from imagination and creation of new worlds. Do you feel a tension between what you’ve experienced and what lives only in your mind?

If a writer writes only what they know, they are going to find out pretty quickly that they run out of stories to tell. But the “write what you know” dictum is still important because whatever you write about you have to prove to yourself and to your reader that you know the subject and your characters.  I tell my own fiction students to write about what they are passionate about.  And if they don’t know the subject or the period, they need to learn about it.  For example, one of my characters in The Garden of Martyrs was based loosely on a French priest named Jean Cheverus, who survived the French Revolution’s “September Massacres” of 1792 and came to America.  I knew very little about the period or about the inner lives of priests, so I had to read much.  I was teaching at a Jesuit University at the time and would talk over lunch with several priests, about their daily lives, their thoughts and feelings. By the end, I felt comfortable enough to write about this topic and this priest.

When did you start writing?

As I mentioned I came to writing—and reading—late.  But instead of starting the way most writers do with short stories, I jumped in the deep end.  I wrote in succession two pretty bad novels.  What it did teach me, however, was the discipline of writing a long narrative.  I was going to college full-time and working 30 hours a week pumping gas or working as a security guard in a defense industry factory, and I’d either get up early and write, or write when I came home.  Though it was only an hour a day, it did get me in the habit of writing, of thinking like a writer—looking at the world as an on-going story filled with possibilities.  While nothing of note came from those early years of writing, I learned to feel that I was a writer.

Has your education helped you become a better writer?

My undergraduate and Master’s in literature allowed me to read widely, and to catch up on the reading I had missed growing up.  But I can’t say that the earlier part of my education helped me as a writer.  I learned the craft of fiction when I entered my Ph.D. program with a specialty in creative writing.  I had never taken a creative writing course before this (big mistake). In my very first workshop with John Williams, who won the National Book Award, I learned the most basic things about the craft of fiction, like scene management, dialogue, character development, use of backstory, and the importance of conflict.  I recall being terribly anxious  before the workshop, being in the class of a National Book Award winner, and afterwards embarrassed that I didn’t know some of the most basic things about writing fiction.  But over the next three years I would learn a great deal and I was able to apply it to my fiction.  Before I left the program I had published a number of short stories in journals.  Within a couple of years after the leaving grad school, I was able to publish 50 stories.  So while my literature education was not directly helpful, my Ph.D. degree was extremely so.

Do you come to your writing through a particular lens? I have a friend who emphasizes style over everything else, though this approach leads him to character development and plot. Do you sketch out the plot first and work out other aspects of the story in relation to that consideration? Do characters spring up in your mind asking you write their stories?

I mentioned earlier that for me story—the “what happened” part of the novel—begins the journey.  But after I sketch out a rough draft of the first third of the book (leaving the last two-thirds open), I focus on language and character, dialogue and description.  Every day I read and reread my prose, often thirty or forty pages that I’ve already written, before I move on to the next scene or part.  During this very fertile time of revising and rethinking and polishing what I’ve written, I also deepen my characters.  I begin to see and hear and feel them in ways I hadn’t at the beginning of the novel.  I know my characters more and more each day, particularly their inner landscape of thoughts and feelings.  At the same time, description of their outer landscape is also important to me.  Where are they? What does it look and feel like—whether it be a hospital bed of the dying Lyman in Skunktown, or town that the young Lyman grows up in. So, while my process starts with story, it soon becomes focused on language and character.

I’ve just finished reading Henry James’ The Portrait of a Lady again and have mixed feelings about the era and the characters. It’s difficult to read about Victorian morés from a 21st Century perspective. Not only do I need lenses that will give me a bi-cultural perspective, but I also feel squashed between a culture clash. Just after I finished with Portrait, I read a review of A. M. Homes’ latest book May We Be Forgiven in The New York Review of Books. One of her main characters says, (more…)

For many years I’ve been recording my dreams each morning and trying to grasp the messages they bring me from the depths. I subscribe to Jung’s view that dreams are messengers from the unconscious, both personal and collective. To ignore them is like refusing to open and read letters from beloved friends that come in the mail. Not spam. Not advertisements. But serious, heartfelt missives (more…)

When I was a child, the popular books for kids included the Nancy Drew mysteries, the Bobbsey Twins, and the Hardy Boys. I loved burying myself in these stories that involved other youth who were trying to find their place in the world. But I also had a passion for fairy tales. I found them at the center of each fat red volume of The Book of Knowledge that my parents had bought from a traveling book salesman. (more…)

Many of my poems reflect a continuing interest in perception and how we try to capture fleeting moments with language. The art that comes closest to what I’m trying to do in poetry is photography, the exploration of things in the world (and in ourselves) from various angles. The attempt to penetrate surfaces by using the very surfaces themselves. (more…)

As a young woman in the 50s growing up in Canada, I was intrigued by hockey and football. Baseball didn’t exist for me then. It hadn’t entered Canadian consciousness, and it would take some years before it did. I didn’t feel deprived. Hockey and football had much to offer at that time, including handsome, vigorous guys. (more…)

Jane Friedman, a publishing industry expert upon whom I rely for trustworthy information recently updated her very helpful guide to hybrid publishing. For anyone considering this publishing route, be sure to read this guide carefully as she outlines many of the warning signs when you consider signing with a hybrid publisher. I also recommend this list from ALLI, which analyzes the companies and individuals eager to help writers in all sorts of ways from editing to publishing to publicizing. This article in Publishers Weekly details the more successful hybrid publishers and their payment models. And finally, I always encourage writers to sign up for the regular emails from Authors Publish. Here is an article on what the author, Emily Harstone, calls the three kinds of publishing. To be clear, she does not distinguish between vanity and hybrid publishing.

But as a fiction writer, I always believe that “the devil is in the details” and so let me tell you the story of one writer’s experience with a hybrid publisher.

Geoffrey Douglas is an accomplished journalist and memoirist. You can sign up for his Substack newsletter, 5000 Bylines Later here. He modestly describes himself as “author and journalist, with six books and 100 or so magazine pieces behind me–about politics, people, gambling, migrants, murder, a town on fire, etc.” The five books he wrote before his current novel Love in a Dark Place, were all traditionally published, well-reviewed and one was turned into a movie. This novel certainly deserves to be. Kirkus Reviews calls it “…a moving, unflinching novel about human depravity, and the way love can coexist in its menacing presence… emotionally hard-hitting, with impressive psychological depth.”

However, when Geoffrey tried to interest an agent in this novel based on his real-life experiences in Atlantic City during the 1980’s, the heyday of corruption and criminality, he couldn’t get anybody to sign him on. Those who did take a look at the manuscript were unnerved by a white male author “daring” (irony all mine) to include a prostitute and a black boxer as two of the main characters, both seen through the eyes of the protagonist. (I could go off on a tangent about the politically correct atmosphere in publishing these days when writers are pushed to stay within their very narrow lanes and only write what they know personally. What happened to imagination? But I digress.) With the big 5 (as the traditional publishing companies are known) only reading manuscripts from agented writers, the doors to publishing the old-fashioned way are slamming shut. This has pushed writers like Geoffrey to seek other ways to get his work out to a wider audience and there are a multitude of companies eager to help writers frustrated with the current system. Some of these are reputable, others not so much. (Once again see the ALLI guide above.)

So, when I asked Geoffrey about his experience with a hybrid publisher, he gave me this overall view of Greenleaf, the company he worked with.

For me, there were two sides to the coin. On the one hand, Greenleaf is a solid, very professional publisher. The editing, design and production of my book were all fabulous: professional, collaborative and endlessly helpful–more so than anything I ever experienced with the mainstream guys who published me before. And the final product is as fine as anything I could’ve hoped for.

The flip side: Although everyone I dealt with was very straightforward, and there was no dissembling as such, the system itself seems almost designed to obfuscate. The numbers you see on the front end are nothing like the final reality. You’re given a set of prices and a menu of options, most of which seem reasonable enough–but no mention is made initially of printing, warehouse storage, delivery to bookstores or a number of smaller services–so, probably like many other authors, I was blindsided by a lot of it. Some of their promotional options don’t seem worth the cost; and the print-run they recommended was far greater than what’s been sold so far or what I now anticipate. But because the number was more or less in line with my past experience with traditional publishers, and because it was their “professional recommendation,” I took the advice, and am now stuck with a monthly storage bill for more than 2,000 books—not to mention the original printing costs.

So my verdict is mixed. Great service, not so great communication. The system, as designed, is almost certain to include some pretty big potholes, even for the most cautious of us. It’s a textbook case of Buyer Beware. I didn’t beware nearly well enough, so that’s on me.

And here’s an assessment of Greenleaf by ALLI (Alliance of Independent Authors) which seems in line with Geoffrey’s experience.

High pressure sales and staggeringly high fees for add-on services tarnish an otherwise excellent service.

These days with the proliferation of pitfalls for writers and the come-ons from AI generated “publicists and editors” as I wrote about recently, it’s sadly become a game of “gotcha!”

I now feel compelled to add a note at the end of this post letting my readers know that this newsletter is and always will be “human authored.”

Elizabeth Winthrop Alsop (www.elizabethwinthropalsop.com) is the author of over 50 works of fiction for adults and children under the pen name Elizabeth Winthrop.  These include the award-winning fantasy series, The Castle in the Attic and The Battle for the Castle as well as the short story, The Golden Darters, read on the nationwide radio program, Selected Shorts, and included in Best American Short Story anthology, and Island Justice and In My Mother’s House, two novels now available as eBooks.  She is the daughter of the acclaimed journalist, Stewart Alsop. Daughter of Spies: Wartime Secrets, Family Lies, a family history about her parents’ love affair during World War II and their marriage lived in the spotlight of Washington during the 1950s was published by Regal House, October 25, 2022.

Follow her newsletters on Substack.

Since 2015, I’ve published four novels, one memoir, and two poetry collections. I tell you this, dear readers and writers, because for the past couple of weeks, I’ve been blasted by emails that are clearly AI generated. Individuals (or maybe robots) want to sell me their marketing services. Some offer access to major nationwide book clubs whose readers will gobble up my narratives. Others offer reviewers that will read and review my work in exchange for a “tip.” I’ve also had one who offered a complete marketing plan for generating more readers. (more…)

Writing has become such a part of my day that if I don’t get to it, I’m constantly distracted, as if I have a lover I’m thinking about. It’s like a siren’s call, pulling me away. My husband notices it. He comments on me seeming drifty. He’s right. I’m not fully there. As happened tonight. (more…)

I’m thinking today of timing—how important it is to success.  Timing and perseverance:  the two go together.  I’m also noticing the seasonal aspect of creativity, how cyclic it is.  That too is hard to grasp.  I want it all the time.  I’m afraid if it isn’t there, it won’t return.  But I need to remember that if I pursue my creative impulses, and if they’re in accordance with my abilities, then there will be success.  Maybe not financially, though that would be nice.  But I’ll experience the satisfaction of achieving what I’m capable of. (more…)

Thanks to Suzanne Sherman for sharing this post on memoir writing:

There were many standout messages in a webinar I attended this week by bestselling author Janet Fitch, hosted by Memoir Nation (www.memoirnation.com/about-memoir-nation). 

This is one of my favorites.

Fitch spoke about stimulating memory to recreate time and place. How to do that?

A clue: Stimulating memory stimulates something inside you as well. It is, as Fitch calls it, “a gateway to memory.”

In my memoir, which publishes in fall 2026, I needed to recreate time and place as far back as 1964, when I was four years old. Important events in the arc of my narrative occurred at that time. Fortunately, I have vivid glimpses of memory to draw from. Still, to build context I needed to write a fuller scene. I had to drop down and find sensory details to go beyond the facts I knew. Depending on facts alone would have resulted in a narrative telling about instead of a recreation of  to take readers there with me. 

That is where stimulating the gateway to memory comes in. The key to the gateway is sense impression.

To get sense impressions, you have to go “back there” and open to the information your senses have for you. This is particularly helpful if memory is absent for the time you’re writing about. 

You may have heard of method acting. Method acting is an emotion-oriented technique in acting used instead of action-based acting. With method acting, an actor aspires to encourage sincere and emotionally expressive performances by fully inhabiting the role of the character. 

Here, we have “method writing.” You need to fully inhabit the role of the character you’re writing about (yourself in an earlier time). If, for example, you’re writing a scene that takes place in a car on a hot day in an era before air-conditioning was common in cars, go take a ride in yours with the air-conditioning turned off to get a sense of being in that car you drove in. Roll down the window and get a feeling for that, get some language for it. This is a felt sense of the experience, or method writing. 

In my memoir there is a scene in 1964 that takes place in a forest. There is a second scene in a forest in 1974, also important in the story. To recreate time and place for both, I went to a forest when I was writing the book—nearly 50 and 60 years later—to get details for the scenes and stimulate memory of the times I was writing about. Sure, I know what a forest is, but what does morning light do inside of one? What scents come up on a summer breeze? How does pine duff sound underfoot?

Go to the gateway to memory as often as you need by visiting a similar scene in current time. And remember: the key to get in is the senses. 

About Suzanne

I’m dedicated to helping writers put their good words into the world.

– Suzanne Sherman

For 40 years, Suzanne has helped hundreds of writers find their voice, strengthen their skills, and complete their salable books. Her clients have published with Wiley & Sons, Chronicle Books, and Ten Speed Press, and others. Many have successfully self-published. Suzanne’s next memoir class is on Zoom, October 6-November 24 (suzannesherman.com/writing-life-memoir-workshop/). Her memoir publishes in fall 2026. For updates and preorders, sign up for her newsletter at suzanne@suzannesherman.com.

Writing Coach & Book Consultant
Memoir Workshops

Email: suzanne@suzannesherman.com

(more…)

The AI Generated Questions

and my answers…

As I wrote in a recent post, I was approached by a media company in the UK asking for an interview. This was the first of what has become a flood of AI generated emails from all over the web enticing writers to participate in what we’ve come to call a “pay to play” scheme. It goes like this. The writer (or rather AI) compliments you on your amazing book/writing career/ insights, etc. Here’s an example.

(more…)

Years ago, when I was first foraying into finding an agent, I was involved for several months with a small Canadian literary agency with one principal, a former practicing contract attorney (I’ll call her Virginia, though that isn’t her real name), and her associate Sandra, a woman who claimed to have years of experience in the New York publishing scene as an agent and editor. Before email became ubiquitous, ours was largely a relationship by mail—post cards, letters, faxes, and, occasionally, phone. (more…)

When I sit in my classroom, I ask students to join me in putting their thoughts on the page. This is old stuff to me. I do it constantly, dribbling out lines that seem to come magically from the pen. They form themselves on the page into what we call sentences, made up of words, phonemes, syllables, letters. And the letters themselves were once ideograms—images, as in Chinese writing—that depicted the thing itself. Now we need a more elaborate process to discover the meaning in the letters. We must attend schools for years where teachers encourage us to spill out our minds and give the contents structure on the page. It’s not unlike what a brain surgeon does when s/he cleans up the mess after a head-on collision. (more…)

It occurred to me today, during a tine when many people are taking vacations, that preparing for a trip—all the many months of planning and making reservations and thinking that the departure day will never arrive—resembles what happens when our death day arrives. Okay, I realize this may sound gloomy and will probably chase away a few readers, but the parallels are there. (more…)

I’ve written before about how difficult it is these days to make a living as a writer. Besides the proliferation of ways to be published (traditional, hybrid, self-publishing), entire industries now exist to convince writers that this publication or that award or this marketing company will “spread the word” far and wide about their work. I was pretty sure that after decades in this business and a recent deep dive into the bogus contests one is encouraged to enter, I had insulated myself against any of these “pay to play” schemes.

I was wrong.

This time the request for an interview came from an outfit describing itself as “a literary magazine based in London.” The first third of my memoir Daughter of Spies is set in England so this seemed like a perfect fit and one that would help increase British sales. I spent three precious writing hours fashioning thoughtful answers to their interview questions which were impressively detailed, another reason I thought this was a legitimate outfit. Someone had really researched the depth and breadth of my published work. And they included my favorite photo with the credit line.

photo by Christiane Alsop

Once I submitted the answers, I received a letter from someone calling herself the Editorial Director of this “magazine.” She should have used AI to write the letter if, as I suspect, English is not her first language. All typos are hers, not mine.

This is A, Editor In Chief of the magazine. I’d like to thank you for participating the inteview. We found insightfull to your inteview and decided to include print editotion.

And the punch line. Authors are expected to order copies of the print magazine at $35 each although Readers House can offer a 60% discount. And although they talk about distribution in 190 countries and you can buy one online from Barnes and Noble for $32.99 (!), it’s not clear, as I should have read first in an article on this excellent website, Writers Beware, that this print magazine is widely available in retail outlets in the UK or anywhere else. Two independent bookstores they list on their site had never heard of the magazine.

As Victoria Strauss of Writers Beware points out, “Reader’s House basically admits, in one of its followup emails, that acquiring readers is not its main goal: ‘Unlike other magazines, our print edition is designed for authors rather than readers.’ In other words, author, you are our customer.”

So this is not exactly a scam but it’s what we’ve come to call a pay to play scheme. As I wrote in an earlier post, “the one thing that has stopped me in my tracks is the number of “come-ons”, scams, and false promises that land in my inbox daily. Every one of these involve me spending money and, in the end, they will cost me far more than I ever expect to make in royalties. And all of them prey on a writer’s desperate desire to be lifted above others in the great cacophony of modern life where people more and more choose visuals on devices over reading the printed word.”

I’ve informed Readers House that I won’t be buying any print copies although I appreciate the online exposure.

However, I hope to include excerpts from the interview in a future Substack newsletter because, as a writer always pressed for time, I can’t stand the thought that one minute of mine was wasted.

Elizabeth Winthrop Alsop (www.elizabethwinthropalsop.com) is the author of over 50 works of fiction for adults and children under the pen name Elizabeth Winthrop.  These include the award-winning fantasy series, The Castle in the Attic and The Battle for the Castle as well as the short story, The Golden Darters, read on the nationwide radio program, Selected Shorts, and included in Best American Short Story anthology, and Island Justice and In My Mother’s House, two novels now available as eBooks.  She is the daughter of the acclaimed journalist, Stewart Alsop. Daughter of Spies: Wartime Secrets, Family Lies, a family history about her parents’ love affair during World War II and their marriage lived in the spotlight of Washington during the 1950s was published by Regal House, October 25, 2022.

Follow her newsletters on Substack.

(more…)

Book Marketing 101: A Refresher Course for all Published Writers

pc-1207686_1920We writers are innocents in many ways, especially regarding the selling side of the publishing business. As long as we can stay in front of our computers, engaged in the dream world of our fictions, we don’t have to think of how these narratives will find their readers.

Now that my four novels (Fling!, Freefall: A Divine Comedy, The Ripening: A Canadian Girl Grows Up (a sequel to Freefall), and Curva Peligrosa have been published, I’ve needed to make the adjustment. It hasn’t been easy.

(more…)

Discovering Narrative Structure in the Dordogne

During our recent month-long vacation in France, we spent a week at an Airbnb rental in the Dordogne area. You, dear reader, may be wondering what this post has to do with writing or reading. But bear with me. You’ll eventually see the connection.

Located near the village of Pellegrue, our accommodations originally were constructed 700 years ago. At that time, the farmer lived in the upper level with his family, and his animals were housed below.

 

Having spent some years on a farm myself as a girl, I have some idea of what the smells and sounds may have been like! Fortunately for us, they hadn’t lingered.

But the external structure has retained its original shape, though its interior has been remodeled. My husband and I were impressed with how the owners, Jane and Mike, originally dairy farmers in Australia, transformed this ancient stone building essentially themselves, calculating how to move beams and hoist them into place, stripping the roof tiles and replacing their under layer before resetting the tile, merging the original stone walls and beams with modern trappings. Modern Italian tile floors meet the authentic stone enclosures on the ground floor, while hardwood floors graces the upper level. The four bathrooms and kitchen all have modern appliances. It’s the ideal blending of old and new, filled with character and charm.

It occurred to me that Jane and Mike’s work was similar to how a novelist constructs a narrative. Sometimes we start out with a basic structure in mind that might not even be conscious yet, but in the process of writing we uncover it, our words like the items needed to construct a building. We link them together until they eventually take shape and tell a coherent story. The story that the Dordogne Airbnb tells is many layered, still resonating with echoes of its past, just as our novels also have multiple levels, the images our words create transporting readers (and writers) into a new (novel) place. And while readers might not be aware of the work that goes into writing long fiction, it involves a lot of heavy lifting!

A Fish Story

One thing my fisherman son has taught me is how important patience is to a writer. My son has fished all of his life. For two years, when he was nine and ten, he went to nearby lakes whenever he could, and each time he told me he would bring fish back for dinner. He didn’t.

But failure didn’t seem to bother him. It was the process he enjoyed, finding just the right bait, putting it on the hook, and sending if off into the depths. He loved sitting or standing on shore, waiting for a nibble, taking in all of the activity around him. So if he didn’t catch anything, it wasn’t a loss because he had gained so much from the experience, filling his vision and hearing with sights and sofishing.jpgunds that enriched him in every way. It also gave him an opportunity to drop out of the daily treadmill and think without interruption for a long period of time.

We writers should be familiar with this process. We constantly dip our pens (or computer fingers) into the depths of the unconscious, hoping to snag images and characters, memories and experiences, that we can later embellish with our imaginations. And even if a particular writing period isn’t as fruitful as we’d hoped (no fish for dinner that night), the practice itself of tuning out the outer world and turning inward has its own benefits, a kind of meditation without the ritualistic structure.

This kind of work requires a high degree of patience. For those of us who write novels, it can take many years for one to finally crystallize and be ready for publication. But that’s only the beginning! Finding a publisher is another arduous route we have to take, and there’s no guarantee that our work will ever be accepted by a traditional publisher. Therefore, we must take pleasure in the activity itself, recognizing that the undertaking is as important as the product.

I was recently reminded yet again of this need for patient watching what I’m snagging from the waters of the unconscious while revising a novel that will be published in 2019: Tillie: A Canadian Girl in Training. While I had written a good deal of the narrative, I was having trouble finding the main character’s voice and style. If I’m not drawn in by a character, I’m certain my reader won’t be either, and I wasn’t connecting with her in the way I wanted to. But I kept playing around with the material, and eventually the character broke free of whatever restraints I had put on her, becoming fully realized. Such a relief to have all of that time and effort pay off!

So the moral of this story is don’t take your hook out of the water too soon or you might miss out on whatever bigger fish waiting there for you to catch.

 

 

The Tyranny of Show vs Tell

If you’ve ever taken a writing workshop, you’ve heard many times the bromide “show, don’t tell,” but often the showing part dominates the telling and becomes tyrannical. As a writer friend once pointed out, when we’re writing fiction, we are storytelling and not storyshowing, and there are many ways to tell an engaging story.

Of course, some beginning writers do tend to summarize more than dramatize. They haven’t learned yet how to traverse between generalities and specifics. And in our early drafts, even more experienced writers often are just trying to capture their characters before they can disappear. Showing, then, tends to happen later in the drafting process.

However, it is important to know when one or the other is required, and that’s the advantage of using this shorthand workshop comment. When we show, we try to embellish scenes and important moments through using descriptive details that create images. Dialogue also helps to nail down character traits and interaction. When we tell, we are usually summarizing background information or periods that don’t need to be in the spotlight. We don’t want to call too much attention to some aspects of the tale we’re conveying.

I’m all for using whatever tools are at our disposal, and I don’t reject the idea that knowing how to show and tell effectively are important elements in writing narrative. However, they aren’t the only “show” in town. There are other ways to create drama and develop character that often get overlooked by the overused workshop mantra.

I’ve been rereading Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse, and I’m absorbed by her characters’ inner lives. Not only does Woolf violate many of the strictures we hear in writing workshops about the dangers of switching points of view within a chapter, but she also rarely resorts to showing or dramatizing a scene. Instead, she seems to inhabit her settings and characters’ interiors, taking the reader with her inside their inner worlds, portraying how complex they are. I feel as if I’m watching a movie of their internal processes.

Of course, Woolf isn’t the only writer who takes a different approach to creating compelling narratives by not depending on show versus tell. W. G. Sebald’s hybrid “novels” have their own narrative logic that also disrupt the usual notion of what constitutes a story. And there are many others in this category: Samuel Beckett, David Foster Wallace, Proust, and other likeminded authors who aren’t afraid of a character’s introspection. In fact, I’m often bored by passages in some naturalistic works that race along, fueled by external action, forgetting to linger and let their creations sink down into the unconscious from which we have emerged.

What’s your take on this topic?

 

PDS versus PDF

 

I sent an email message to family and friends recently that the publisher of Fling! had offered me a three-book contract. It will include my novel Freefall: A Divine Comedy (to be published in 2017), Tillie: Portrait of a Canadian Girl in Training, and a third that also will feature the Tillie character (she appears in Freefall as well).

One long-time friend responded, “You have worked harder as a writer than anyone I know and I’m proud of you!”

I replied, “I’ve learned that perseverance and determination and self-belief are essential to succeeding as a writer.”

But what does this mean?

writer copyLet’s start with perseverance. We persevere when we continue doing something even if we have no assurance of success. If writers want to be published, they must endure self-doubt, rejections, and blocks to eventually be published. Writing a novel takes a long time. I started working on Fling! in 1999 and it wasn’t published until 2015! Of course, I wasn’t focused on Fling! all those years. I wrote other novels in the meantime. Yet if I hadn’t persisted, the book would not be out in the world, seeking its readers.

And determination? Clearly, it takes considerable resolve in order to follow this torturous path. Writers have to get up each day, sit down in front of the computer screen, and face the blank page, intent on moving the narrative forward (or even sideways if that’s the direction it wants to take) in order to complete the work. It requires considerable grit, doggedness, and courage to pick up the metaphorical pen and keep writing, no matter what.

By now you can see why self-belief is so essential. If you don’t have basic confidence in yourself as a writer, and that only comes from proving to yourself you have the right stuff by writing regularly, it will be more difficult for you to press on. The more we do something, the more our skills at that task improve. If I want to become a good tennis player, I can’t just go out a few times and swing at some balls. I’ll never develop belief in myself as a tennis player with that approach. But if I take some lessons and pursue the game consistently, I’m bound to improve. The same is true of writing, so that these three words—perseverance, determination, and self-belief—create a circle. Inside that ring is the writer who one day will find publishing success because s/he’s pursued his/her dream.

Hence, Perseverance, determination, and self-belief (PDS) versus Passivity, Doubt, and Fear (PDF).

 

 

IS AUTOBIOGRAPHY THE ONLY FORM IN ALL THE ARTS?

I’ve just read a review by Elaine Blair of Rachel Cusk’s novel Outline in the January 2015 New Yorker. Blair says, Cusk has written admiringly about Knausgaard, and her proposed cure for the trouble with fiction sounds like a gloss of his. ‘Autobiography is increasingly the only form in all the arts,’ she told the Guardian.” Blair goes on to say that some writers are hewing closer to the author’s subjective experiences, of effacing the difference between fiction and their own personal lives.

But Blair also points out that “Cusk’s shorthand doesn’t begin to account for the variety of literary experiments we’ve been seeing from novelists like Knausgaard, …. and W. G. Sebald” (70). As a writer, I’m all for any kind of improvisation on the novel or any other kind of narrative. I haven’t read Knausgaard, but I have devoured all of W. G. Sebald’s “fictions,” novels that are truly novel in that he has invented a hybrid form. He incorporates travelogue, biography, memoir, speculation, and literary criticism into the narrator’s perspective: often a wandering and thoughtful observer of his surroundings.

Vertigo was the first of Sebald’s books that I read. In order to enter his world, I had to disregard most of my preconceptions about what a novel should be. Initially, I was attracted by his playfulness and the tongue-in-cheek tone, as well as by the sly humor and wit. I also felt there was something else lurking there. Just as the narrator has a paranoid fear of being watched or followed, I felt followed by something in the book that I couldn’t quite identify, some truth or knowledge, as often happens with good poetry where meaning emerges from around the poem’s borders. Sebald’s approach explodes for me the myths I’ve created about novels needing to incorporate dramatic scenes, etc., all of the various workshop admonitions about narrative arc and development.

Though I haven’t read Cusk’s work, and only have this review to go on, I am concerned with the idea that some writers may rely more on their personal experiences to create “fictions” than employ their imaginations. Contemporary life is already too one-dimensional and focused on surfaces. Most people aren’t aware of their dreams and the unconscious. Or they deny that anything other than the day’s residue is being circulated in these nighty dramas. What a loss!

As Carl Jung pointed out in Man and His Symbols, “Imagination and intuition are vital to our understanding” (82). He goes on to say that it isn’t just poets or other artists who employ these ways of perceiving, but they are also essential to scientists. He emphasizes that the rational intellect isn’t the only way of knowing or understanding ourselves and the world (inner or outer) and claims that “the surface of our world seems to be cleansed of all superstitious and irrational elements” (86). This observation is even truer today than when Jung wrote this piece in 1961 near the end of his life.

If our novels are limited to portraying our everyday experiences, the chitchat that goes on in our living rooms and other social settings, then we are missing a whole level of vitality and knowledge. It’s the imagination in conjunction with the unconscious that produces myths, symbols, and alternate views of reality. Not that our personal experiences can’t be imbued with these elements, but if they are the sole basis for our fictions, then we are deprived of something much richer and more worthwhile.

 

 

 

 

WP to LinkedIn Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com